I imagine that's because, like all other TDS sufferers, you can't tell the difference between facts, and your own speculation about what those facts mean, and how they should be interpreted.
As such, I further imagine no one wishes to take the time to refute specious suppositions before they can even get into a substantive discussion.
I know when *I* run across those who simply will not entertain the idea their evaluation of Trump may be flawed, to the exclusion of any and all "exculpatory" rationales, I usually don't bother wasting my valuable FReeping time with them.
Attacking the poster instead of the content is a classic Alinsky tactic. It means you have nothing to refute the content.