Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“After all, in 2002, National Review obtained 15 of the 19 hijackers’ visa applications and discovered that none of them had been completed properly. None of them should have been approved. In other words, existing systems should have prevented the hijackers’ entry into the United States.”

That statement:

1.) Contradicts what Rush said yesterday about most of the hijackers being here legally.

2.) Contradicts his assertion that Trump would not have had time to go to Congress and get new immigration legislation, when in fact no new legislation would have been needed.

3.) Other than the Trump bashing, a fairly decent article from French for a change. Rich Lowery will not be pleased.


22 posted on 10/20/2015 9:04:25 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: odawg
"1.) Contradicts what Rush said yesterday about most of the hijackers being here legally."

Similar to getting a legitimate drivers license despite a fraudulent application.

24 posted on 10/20/2015 9:11:15 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: odawg

There is no contradiction. All had approved visas. The pilots were here since 2000. Some visas had expired. It was an intelligence and bureaucratic failure. And it will happen again, Trump or no Trump.


36 posted on 10/20/2015 9:21:56 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson