Back at ya.
By the way, if you want to insist on a conspiracy it's up to you to produce evidence that proves one. And no, "questions" are not evidence.
“By the way, if you want to insist on a conspiracy it’s up to you to produce evidence that proves one. And no, “questions” are not evidence.”
My statement yesterday was that it is inconceivable that someone could believe that Lee Harvey Oswald could actually pull that assassination off by himself, even if he had advance personal knowledge of the parade route.
Prove the conspiracy now, in this little box, after thousands of books have been written, and some of them actually knew what they were writing about?
Does everyone have to amass legal evidence for you that proves Barack Obama conspires against the United States before you will accept it?
Is it your default position to believe everything the government says?
But, those are questions and you are too pure to ask questions.
It is not my responsibility to prove a damn thing to you.