How is it possible for anyone to believe Oswald did all that by himself?
There was a cover up, and then a cover up of the cover up.
Limbaugh is way off here..all the cover ups..no way He did it himself..not a chance..he was a lightweight
One thing says it all and lays it out. Four weeks after the assassination, President Truman had this OpEd published in the Washington Post.
http://www.maebrussell.com/Prouty/Harry%20Truman’s%20CIA%20article.html
That means when Kennedy was barely buried, THIS was the thing in the forefront of Truman’s mind. THIS was what he wanted the American people to know was a critical order of business.
Of course, how would the public react to a Soviet asset killing the president?
JFK wasn’t worth nuclear war, and so Washington went along with the conspiracy theorists in covering up the evidence.
That wasn’t the point. Set up or not, JFK was the last conservative sort of democrat, and being a sort of catholic in comm with the Vatican (and hence vietnam machinations in the middle of this)— represented at least to those who loved the “camelot” a kind of decent family time. Never mind all the security risks he posed, his habits, his power crazy brother, and.... the mob. Never forget the Castros didn’t forget the plots, and the Alpha 66 never forgot the lack of air support at Bay of Pigs, among other things.
Rush’s point is salient. Oswald was there. He was a socialist/commie who had lived in USSR and made inroads at Mexican embassy for them. A nut. And, for what it is worth- the shot was NOT impossible. It is a straightaway line. Ask any sniper. But, I get your point. And look to LBJ- a more lying SOB there never was, and who put the US into the “war on poverty” a trillion later and we gets.... obamaumao and more white guilt that never ends.
You should have seen the 6th floor before they turned the thing into a museum. I am a mediocre shot, but even I could have hit Kennedy from that position. I stood in that corner and with a toilet paper tube sighted in the route taken by that car. It was an easy shot. As to what motivated Oswald? Maybe the same as that of the guy who shot McKinley. McKinley, BTW, was much more popular than Kennedy was.
Because there is absolutely no evidence, let alone proof, that anyone other than Oswald commited the crime. Before you go off, I have read dozens of books, seen all the films, gone to lectures, even visited the assassination site. Oswald did it. The obfuscation began with that pinko Mark Lane, with support of the KGB. The confusion continues, but the truth has been known since November of 1963.