Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Artemis Webb

So using that logic was President Reagan to blame for the killing of 299 Marines in Beirut in 1983?

good point. using that logic, Obama is to blame for Bengazhi?


10 posted on 10/17/2015 11:54:30 AM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: WilliamIII

yes because the Ambassador had begged more than once for more protection for an attack that he knew was going to come and Hillary and Obama rejected it because they didn’t want “big footsteps (bigger US military presence)” in Libya


84 posted on 10/17/2015 12:43:19 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: WilliamIII

No. Both had been planned well before they took office.
Pearl Harbor was different. FDR knew the date, time and location of the attack. He left those stationed there sitting ducks. He let it happen to rev up the people so they would support the war. Until the attack, most people did not want to get involved in that war. This later was not denied by the media. Documentation supports this.


137 posted on 10/17/2015 1:49:48 PM PDT by RightLady (It's gotta be Cruiz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson