[gogeo]

I'm constantly amazed and disappointed at the mindset I see...that blame or responsibility need be assigned to one actor, and all others involved were passive, blameless meat puppets.

Al Qaeda flew the planes into the buildings. W didn't. The House of Said was/is funding terrorist groups.

BJ was more worried about under desk activity than responding to the first WTC bombing, which was treated as...a law enforcement issue.

W's administration wasn't up and running. This is primarily because Harry Reid was playing politics with nominees.

W sat in the oval office. It happened on his watch. He chose as his priority his "new tone," being "a uniter, not a divider."

Leadership...would Trump be sitting quietly in the Oval Office, preserving the "new tone," or would he have been lighting a fire under Reid's @ss? Would priorities and plans happened PDQ? Would Trump be spouting ROP nonsense? A hint...the Twin Towers were a New York landmark.

No one should be held responsible for that which they do not control, but should be for that which they can...whether or not they choose to do so.

[jimbo807]

Sounds like W wasn’t up to the task, huh?

Pitiful defense.

[RoosterRedux]

The House of Said was/is funding terrorist groups

Yet W let the Saudi's off the hook and went after Iraq (destabilizing the delicate balance between Shia and Sunnis in the ME).

[Steven Tyler]

28 pages of the politicized 9 11 report remain redacted.

Let’s see what is on those 28 pages.
Let’s see what the politicized process left on the cutting room floor