[William Tell]

867V309 said: "For instance, why didn't they give Hillary's IT guy immunity so he would have to testify or go to jail? "

I think it would be best to wait until all the participants get a chance to answer questions or take the fifth before deciding who gets a deal and who doesn't.

Also, I think it is just possible that a deal has already been made for immunity. Maybe several deals.

[McGruff]

.@HumaAbedin on speaking to #Benghazi committee: “I answered all their questions to the best of my ability.” #Greta

[867V309]

I think it would be best to wait until all the participants get a chance to answer questions or take the fifth before deciding who gets a deal and who doesn't.

Also, I think it is just possible that a deal has already been made for immunity. Maybe several deals.

Well, I can't imagine the IT guy was doing anything other than what Hillary or Huma directed. I doubt he's an FBI target, so it makes sense to find out what he knows now, his info could push the investigation ahead by months.

And, we have no reason to suspect any immunity has been granted; no House committee has shown this kind of cleverness in the past. I think gowdy is doing as little behind the scenes as he's doing in front.