Skip to comments.
Obama says Clinton didn’t harm national security with private email server
washington times ^
| 10/12/15
| Dave Boyer
Posted on 10/12/2015 2:43:53 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Of course not, and I don't know anything about that private server I got emails from.
1
posted on
10/12/2015 2:43:53 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
2
posted on
10/12/2015 2:44:15 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: Nachum
Where’s Joe Wilson’s “YOU LIE!” GIF when you need it?
3
posted on
10/12/2015 2:46:47 PM PDT
by
PrairieDawg
(This space for rent)
To: Nachum
4
posted on
10/12/2015 2:47:15 PM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: Nachum
I'm sure he knows nothing about any of these emails. Yet, somehow, he has concluded that national security was never compromised.
Interesting.
5
posted on
10/12/2015 2:48:13 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(I've switched. Trump is my #1. He understands how to get things done. Cruz can be VP.)
To: Nachum
This is why Hillary has not looked worried.
She knows the fix is in with President Evil.
6
posted on
10/12/2015 2:48:41 PM PDT
by
Calpublican
(Republican Party Now Stands for Nothing!!!!!(Except Conniving))
To: Nachum
Hey Obama, a citizen of Rumania hacked all of Hillary’s emails—how is that NOT a national security risk?
Just another Goebbels level lie—repeat it often enough, and the LIVs roll over and go back to sleep.
These are not the droids you are looking for....
7
posted on
10/12/2015 2:48:42 PM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: Nachum
How many emails did you send to Hillary?
How many emails did she send to you, 0buttboy?
8
posted on
10/12/2015 2:51:22 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: Nachum
Obama's actually disappointed she didn't damage our national security enough with her private email server.
9
posted on
10/12/2015 2:53:52 PM PDT
by
Boogieman
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
I don't think it posed a national security problem. It was a mistake that she has acknowledged.
So, the fact that she committed a federal offense, did Steve-O and his fellow shills mention that in a cutaway? Didn't think so.
10
posted on
10/12/2015 2:54:53 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: Nachum
Obama says Clinton didnt harm national security with private email serverIrrelevant. Keeping one classified document on an uncleared server is illegal. That server could be in a locked room, unattached to any network, with armed guards, and she would still be in violation of federal law.
11
posted on
10/12/2015 2:55:06 PM PDT
by
thesharkboy
(posting without reading the article since 1998)
To: Nachum
So, if Hillary prints out a top secret document and accidentally leaves it at a bar after knocking off a few borbons, if the bartender tosses it into the garbage without reading it, did she harm national security? Maybe not, but that is not the criterion. The question is whether her actions could have POTENTIALLY caused harm to the United States. The answer to that is abundantly clear.
12
posted on
10/12/2015 2:57:10 PM PDT
by
TruthShallSetYouFree
(If Hillary's last name were anything but Clinton, she'd already be behind bars.)
To: Nachum
I hope the CIA asset she outed is home safe.
To: Nachum
Well, that’s good enough for me.
14
posted on
10/12/2015 2:57:57 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Step away from the Koolade.)
To: Nachum
Contrast this with the way the Republicans threw Scooter Libby under the bus.
15
posted on
10/12/2015 2:58:55 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Step away from the Koolade.)
To: Nachum
I dont think it posed a national security problem. It was a mistake that she has acknowledged. Obama's duplicity is so obvious. Clinton, Bergdahl, Petraeus, Lerner, are examples of federal employees who might have been prosecuted. There are more and they all seem to fall the same way.
16
posted on
10/12/2015 2:59:31 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(The kangaroos have taken over the supreme court.)
To: Nachum
There goes all the conspiracy folks thinking that Obama is behind the investigations and her low polling. I knew it wasn’t the case. Dimocrats protect dimocrats no matter the person or issue.
17
posted on
10/12/2015 2:59:50 PM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(An Oath is Forever)
To: Nachum
Yeah, we’ll get a perfectly “objective” investigation out of THIS “Justice” Department, I’m sure....
18
posted on
10/12/2015 3:02:10 PM PDT
by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: Nachum
It’s against the law for Obama to interfere with a criminal investigation. What he thinks means nothing at this point though
To: ClearCase_guy
Obama thinks we’re all stupid enough not to see his fingerprints all over the drip-drip of disclosures about Hillary’s email problem.
He may be downplaying this, but he’s also stroking Joe Biden’s considerable ego.
20
posted on
10/12/2015 3:03:32 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson