There is no delegation to the Federal government for their regulation of marriage, the power is reserved to the States.
For the USSC to use the equal protection clause to claim jurisdiction they must first adopt a radical and novel definition of “marriage”
Once the radical and novel definition of “marriage” has been adopted by the USSC they may then make a legitimate claim of an equal protection issue, but not until they have adopted the radical and novel definition of “marriage” is there an equal protection issue.
Not until they have adopted the radical and novel definition of “marriage” may they have the fig leaf of jurisdiction thus paving the way for the subsequent illicit imposition of the radical and novel definition of “marriage”
This circular absurdity is nothing compared to the breathtaking arrogance of declaring what the law of each and all of the States shall be.
By declaring that homosexuals may, in each and every State, marry, they have made themselves a Super-Legislature of ALL the States collectively as a whole - a Branch of Government which does not exist under the U.S. Constitution!
Not only have the made themselves legislators, they have erected a fourth Branch of Government. A fourth Branch of Government which substitutes its legislation for that of each and all of the States.
They have legislated. They have intruded upon the independent sovereignty of the States. They have acted entirely outside the Constitution.
To conceal and “justify” their compound criminality they clothe it with an invented “fundamental right” where there is no such right.
The compound criminality of Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan demands their impeachment.
As Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan must be impeached so must Roberts for his serial criminality regarding PPACA re-writing and absurd interpretation of words (”established by the state”).
Roberts, like Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, have attacked language itself. If their attack is not repelled then the meaning of any word is indeterminate, even if it has been well established since time immemorial. The power to alter words means the power of the USSC is unlimited. Anything can be said to be an equal protection violation - or anything else they damn well please.
They imagine themselves Kings. They need to be thrown out on their ass.
Thrown out and prosecuted for crimes against US citizens.
Cordially,
An Appellate decision by the USSC CANNOT APPLY to Any State, It can only be applied to the case at hand. only those cases heard in their ‘Original Jurisdiction” at the supreme Court level apply to States.
Read section 2 closely and remember the word “SHALL” means it is MANDATORY, Not an Option.
Just because the supreme Court refuses to abide the Constitution does not mean STATES have to go along with it.
Article 3, section 2:
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.