You know what REALLY bugs the ADL..?
That a visibly non-Jew rendered judgement on a topic that is somehow exclusively “the property of” Jews.
They’re not really rendering a judgement over whether guns would have helped Jews, or not.
They just want to make ANY topic that has ANYTHING to do with Jews out-of-bounds for a black guy, or more generally, for a non-Jew or for a Conservative.
They want people so terrified that when a subject like this comes up, people or maybe entities like the FBI have to come to the ADL and PAY them to render THEIR HOLY JUDGEMENT.
“If every Jewish and anti-Nazi family in Germany had owned a Mauser rifle
and twenty rounds of ammunition AND THE WILL TO USE IT,
Adolf Hitler would be a little-known footnote to the history of the Weimar Republic.”
In the 20th Century: Governments murdered four times as many civilians
as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined.
Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals.
http://jpfo.org/articles-assd04/codrea-kapos-for-kristallnacht.htm
If you don’t understand words...perhaps a picture is worth MORE THAN A THOUSAND...words.
http://grossmanproject.net/images/Einsatzgruppen2.jpg
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”
— Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
Interesting article on what humans do to other humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einsatzgruppen
when one group has power (guns) and the other groups do not have power (guns).
Power is used by evil people to take what is not theirs to take.
4 From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?
2 Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not, because ye ask not.
3 Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+4&version=KJV
Dr. Ben Carson is right on some points...
but very wrong on One Point:
Dr. Ben Carson To Beck: You Have No Right To Semi-Automatic Weapons in Large Cities
http://tapwires.com/2015/09/13/ben-carson-to-beck-you-have-no-right-to-semi-automatic-weapons-in-large-cities
...he says because there is a lot of crime...! So ANYWHERE there is a LOT of Crime YOU do not HAVE YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to Keep and Bear ARMS!
So if the goobermunt says there is a lot of crime in Amerika...you do not have a 2nd Amendment right to “bear arms” Rigkt?
WRONG Dr. Carson.
The following photograph explains what Dr. Ben Carson should have answered:
http://www.alloutdoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Knabenschiessen2-660x595.jpg
The woman above and any of her children...will not be at a disadvantage
IF she owns the semi-auto rifle she is training to use.
And one more quote, If I may...
Luke 22:36He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
“That a visibly non-Jew rendered judgement on a topic that is somehow exclusively “the property of” Jews.”
You have “hit the nail square on the head” with that statement. It’s the truth and it cannot be challenged.
