Posted on 10/10/2015 9:36:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Rep. Tom McClintock of California is about as conservative a Republican as you can find in Congress. As a state legislator in Sacramento, he was a well-known budget hawk. In the House, writes The Almanac of American Politics, he has been "a faithful conservative vote, though an occasionally nettlesome one to GOP leaders seeking to limit internal dissent." Former California Gov. Pete Wilson has such marked antipathy for McClintock that he took the unusual step of supporting a GOP challenger in McClintock's latest re-election bid.
It says everything about how dysfunctional the GOP House has become that such a solo flier as McClintock has taken a stand against the GOP insurgency that torpedoed House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy's bid to become speaker of the House. I talked to McClintock on Thursday after McCarthy bowed out of the race. He was "stunned by the announcement and very disappointed."
Last month, McClintock resigned from the House Freedom Caucus, a rump of some 40 GOP members who have demanded outsize representation in the GOP caucus. Before McCarthy left, the House Freedom Caucus announced its support for Rep. Daniel Webster of Florida -- which undercut McCarthy's ability to lead.
Though McClintock says he agrees with the group's fiscally conservative principles, he also believes that its tactics have sabotaged the conservative cause. In February, the House Freedom Caucus pushed to defund President Barack Obama's immigration policies -- and failed. In May, the caucusers tried to kill the free trade bill. Failed again. Worse, the caucus forced the House leadership to abandon legally binding action against Obama's "disastrous Iran nuclear agreement" in favor of a symbolic and legally meaningless vote.
"A common theme through each of these incidents is a willingness -- indeed, an eagerness -- to strip the House Republican majority of its ability to set the House agenda," McClintock wrote, saying the behavior has unwittingly become House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's "tactical ally."
McClintock believes that representatives can and should vote their conscience on specific legislation. But when it comes to the party, no Republican should sabotage the leadership. "We're now in a situation where at least 29 Republicans have taken the position that if they don't like the Republican nominee for speaker, they will combine with the Democrats against that nominee," he told me. It's a dangerous game because Democrats could end up cutting deals with 29 centrist Republicans who might care to, say, eliminate the mandated spending caps. Open this door, it can swing either way.
McClintock saw a prequel to the House brawl in California's 1995 speakership wars. One Republican -- actually three in a row -- cut deals with the Democratic minority to thwart the GOP majority's ability to control the state Assembly. In the next term, Democrats regained the majority.
The Republicans have their largest majority since 1928 -- 247 seats -- until you subtract Republicans who are willing to sacrifice unity for feckless gestures. The simple fact is that the House Freedom Caucus does not have the votes to put one of its own at the helm. It can only stop other Republicans from winning 218 votes.
Rep. Devin Nunes of California, a McCarthy ally, has spent years working on serious policy, only to see conservative initiatives drowned out by the chaos. "They've hijacked the whole conservative movement," he lamented. Indeed, he is so fed up with this GOP minority's trying to control the party that he suggested kicking out Republicans who won't support the majority's choice. "They don't understand what power is," Nunes told me. Their idea of winning is "no speaker" or a "weak speaker."
After the outgoing House speaker, John Boehner, announced his resignation, his former lieutenant, Eric Cantor, took on Boehner's detractors in The New York Times. Cantor often hears, he wrote, the lament of the GOP base that the party needs to fight: "On this I agree. It is imperative that we fight for what we believe in. But we should fight smartly. I have never heard of a football team that won by throwing only Hail Mary passes, yet that is what is being demanded of Republican leaders today."
So what is stopping her from announcing that she will run for the position?
What is HFC?
And give up putting Hillary in prison?
What is sad is that McClintock was an uncompromising member of the California legislature, blocking budgets and refusing to give in, using a minority status to the fullest extent possible. He has clearly been seduced by Washington. I never thought it could happen to him. He may be the biggest disappointment there. Imagine if Reagan had gone to DC, and governed as Bush. That's what it's like.
” The Republican party is quite unified. Just look at all their campaign adds from the last election”
That’s a joke, right?
I mean, you’re trying to define who these people are based on their lying ads?
While Trey Gowdy’s ratings at vote smart.org are good, Tom McClintock’s rating are better
Tell former Speaker John Boehner the Freedom Caucus failed. Tell Speaker wannabe McCarthy the Freedom Caucus failed. The surrender caucus doesn’t get to define victory. Maybe if they had been working to solidify a base, instead of preemptively surrendering they would not be in such disarray.
A good leader could force them to do what they know is right.
Hard to resist.
Not sure if I trust votesmart.org, have you seen who endorses them? CNN, NYT, LAT, etc.
“A good leader could force them to do what they know is right.”
Your problem is that lots of them believe wrong is right.
“And give up putting Hillary in prison?”
You crack me up.
ValJar and Michelle are not about to allow Hillary into the White House, never mind the Big He.
What’s going on now is a negotiation over the price of her dropping out.
Apparently a pardon for the email problem is not enough. Since the Foundation is the actual problem, I imagine Team Clinton wants pardons for all 3 of them + Mills, Kendall, and others. This Obama is unwilling to do.
It’s unknown how much Team Clinton has on “Obama”. It’s also unknown how much the FBI can come up with to make indictments over the Foundation crimes (bribery, tax evasion, and espionage) stick.
So, there’s a temporary stalemate.
However, once the two unresolved issues are on the table, Hillary will stand down and will get a pardon.
She will never be President, but she will never stand trial, either.
Let’s make the left’s collective heads explode:
Sarah Palin!
House Freedom Caucus. They use the acronym on the Hill.
Yessssssssss
So? *shrug*
Thanks
I don’t have a problem at all. You certainly do. Why don’t you refute what I say, not what I am. Bye
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.