Only an idiot would give any serious thought to your outlandish contention that the Gubmit, as sorry as it often is, instigated the rival biker gang shootout. It MUST HAVE BEEN COPS WITH MIND CONTROL.......... that made em do it.
To the Waco cops credit they had some pretty good intel on these outlaw gangs and by their presence and intervention most likely saved a significant number of lives that day. What would make you think your bike gangster heros would have said ‘well that’s enough” when they finally ran out of ammo and would not have taken up the ballpeen hammers on anyone left twitchin?
Keep digging your hole.
“...It MUST HAVE BEEN COPS WITH MIND CONTROL.......... that made em do it....”
********************************************************************************
My suspicion is that the only “mind control” that the “cops” needed to exercise was using the nerves connecting their own brains to their own trigger fingers. Do you ever wonder why “they” are so hesitant to release the ballistic reports and the huge mountain of video they have?
“...the Waco cops ... by their presence and intervention most likely saved a significant number of lives that day. What would make you think your bike gangster heros would have said ‘well that’s enough” when they finally ran out of ammo...”
********************************************************************************
So, it’s YOUR contention that among the dead (and wounded) bikers were the shooters of the other dead (and wounded) bikers. And that the “cops”, by shooting down these “biker shooters” saved many lives that day? And that this contention will be supported by the ballistic reports and the video evidence that the “cops” are so intent on not being released?
If that is your contention, and it sure seems that way to my plain-thinking mind as I read this post of yours, can you say so now for the record? When the evidence is eventually released as a part of civil suit discovery, then we’ll know whether that contention was accurate or JUST WISHFUL THINKING on your part.
“...If that is your contention, and it sure seems that way to my plain-thinking mind as I read this post of yours, can you say so now for the record?...”
*******************************************************************************
In the interest of intelligent dialogue and helping with my struggles to understand your “position”, are you going to answer the above question and my other questions in posts 84, 85, 87 & 88 above?