Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kvanbrunt2

The difference between “use” and “purpose” is semantics. Did you think that when government seized property in order to lay down the Transcontinental Railroad, the land did not ultimately go to private entities? When they seized land for utilities, do you think there weren’t private-owned utilities that ended up as owners?


251 posted on 10/07/2015 7:40:03 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Behind the Blue Wall

the words have different meanings. from cambridge.

Purpose: noun: The reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists: the purpose of the meeting is to appoint a trustee the building is no longer needed for its original purpose

Use: noun: The action of using something or the state of being used for some purpose: a member of staff is present when the pool is in use theater owners were charging too much for the use of their venues

Railroads have a unique history in the US. but i do not believe that eminent domain can be used to transfer ownership from a citizen to another citizen. if it is taken by eminent domain is is available to be used by everyone. easements should be negotiable by the persons involved in the establishment of the easement. most utilities started out as private and worked thru the basic property rights associated. Gas companies ran pipes under streets etc because the streets had been taken by cities. Just beacuse it was done doesn’t make it right or constitutional.


276 posted on 10/07/2015 8:18:16 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson