Posted on 10/06/2015 3:22:51 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
He was incredibly good. Gave specifics, was strong, was presidential.
And what energy!
I will post a video when it hits youtube.
“You can’t reason with the TrumpBots. If Trump says it, then it is right. No debate allowed.”
-—There is an east solution. Don’t read the Trump threads, but I’m guessing you’re not mature enough to do that, right
Trump did offer this lady and neighbors a million dollars for their property, all owners took the money GLADLY and moved, this lady ended up with NOTHING, designs were redrawn and BAM there she sat with her beat up old shack and ALL of her neighbors got big brand new homes with cash left over!!!!! What an idiot she was!!!!!!
Or a limited vocabulary.
Smoke is coming out of my ears!!!!!!
At first, Charles and Marla said some rather nicer things about Trump, but Steve chided them for it, so they changed their tune.
Kelo may be an issue.....concerning taking away homes.
...but all 3 of these smart aleck panelists would welcome millions and millions of illegals into our country to take away our jobs, homes , everything!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hypocrites’!!!!!!!
I would vote for Trump, but I vacillate between amusement and disgust watching how some folks here swoon for him and attack anyone who questions him.
Very good point and I couldn’t agree more.
Arrogance has no place in disagreement.
I think some people try to “out conservative” others. They make asses out of themselves.
Yes, the system worked—to stop Trump from abusing the system.
Just google “Trump eminent domain” — plenty of examples of him using it. Atlantic City. Bridgeport, CT. And more.
Property rights be damned, right?
No.
Pray for our country, that the Lord will give us the leader we need. We need His wisdom, can’t rely on our own in this most troubling time.
It’s too early to be candidate specific. I’m still open to any of them, but this Trump interview is certainly troubling.
(And the nasty attitudes of some of his supporters on this thread are not helping him. At all.)
But when they do, their eyes will glaze over and they will be useless for the foreseeable future.
It's a whole new ball game.
-—There is an east solution. Don’t read the Trump threads, but I’m guessing you’re not mature enough to do that, right
You’re an arrogant, immature azz.
That’s my impression of you and I’ll read any threads I want and take from them what I want and comment on them as I want to.
Go Trump!
Do you believe every Home/Property owner gets a huge check in eminent domain cases? I’ve read about many cases where people have been forced from their land receiving no compensation or at a huge loss. Plus people are forced to sale in many cases because property values dropped. I don’t like it when people with deep pockets can buy off politicians to do their dirty work
He walked away
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Coking
Do your research before posting
I will be glad of the day I see Steve Hayes and ilk in my rear view mirror!
HE WAS DISPICABLE!!!!
Pretty much says it all.
Why does it matter why the owner of the house wants to keep their property? It's theirs. Period. End of story. It's called Conservatism.
If preservation of the past is the goal...that's one thing. And a quite acceptable thing.
But if the future is embraced with roads and shopping centers, that's another thing.
Our society needs to decide.
I think both have a lot to offer.
Actually, at my age (67 y/o), I like the preservation of the past. But that's just me.
This Rooster poster is just showing his character, mean and ugly. It’s easier to attack and smear than to exercise the brain by thinking.
Is it actually an abuse of the system when you have one individual holding up development of an area-- when all areas are already sold-- only because he or she wants 2 million instead of the one million offered?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.