Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarchonDC09122009

I’m confused. Doesn’t TPP need 60 votes to pass? Wasn’t the TPA only the entry point into these other trade agreements, which is why Cruz voted for it?


22 posted on 10/06/2015 3:12:45 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Jews For Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: EQAndyBuzz

TPA allows for the up or down vote of trade bills and no amendments for six years. TPP falls into that window, so no need of 60 for the pass, only a majority.


24 posted on 10/06/2015 3:21:19 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Mariner provided status details and feared outcome, correctly:

“After the show trial, the US Congress will pass this.

After all, they had their mind made up when they passed TPA, which ascertains TPP passage unless blocked by 60 votes in the US Senate.

Yes, China will join later:”Trade ministers said the TPP would in future be open to other countries, including potentially China.”

Good job there GOPe (inclusive of EVERY Senator who voted for TPA).
1 posted on Tue Oct 6 13:52:55 2015 by Mariner


25 posted on 10/06/2015 3:22:28 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: EQAndyBuzz

No, it doesn’t. That was the point of TPA. Maybe you were asleep.


28 posted on 10/06/2015 3:30:49 PM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson