You are one misguided soul. Arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court is not leadership - it’s just what an attorney does - and a darned good one at that. So, why don’t you go eat your cookies and milk? You are another sour puss on here - and as I said - a misguided one.
Being a Racketter is?
You’re an infant, just like your cult master.
Ignorant as hell, too.
One candidate perceives the 2nd amendment as there because people have a right to protect themselves from violent criminals who also have guns.
The other candidate perceives the 2nd amendment as there in order to guarantee all the other amendments, not to mention the Constitution.
Talk about misguided -- you equate the two candidates' position on the 2nd amendment! Their positions are profoundly separate, and if you vote for the first mindset, then you had better understand that once criminals don't have guns (a constant goal), your right to own them will evaporate. That is what you risk voting for. See my tagline.