Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 5th MEB

None of which should be necessary. Nor will it avoid prosecution for killing a protected wolf.


79 posted on 10/05/2015 1:18:10 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

Agreed; none of which SHOULD be necessary, but how do the feds prosecute YOU if one of your animals kills a wolf?
A range steer can gore or stomp a wolf to death, a horse can stomp a wolf to death, a dog bred to protect livestock can tear a wolf to shreds.
Just nature; red in tooth and claw, no justifiable cause for action unless they want to prosecute the dog.
The dogs defense is “ I was just doing what comes natural, just like the wolves”.


117 posted on 10/05/2015 7:54:16 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson