Posted on 10/02/2015 7:08:25 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Yes...you idiots....
Ask the black robes.
They know everything.
Yes.
Next question...
If repeating a Seinfeld joke in the workplace constitutes sexual harassment, then surely forcing a woman to view a penis in a women’s locker room does. But what do I know? That’s common sense thinking, so it doesn’t apply anymore.
But colleges have to provide “safe spaces” for students who feel threatened by simply hearing the word “rape” to retreat to.
How does things so simple get so complicated...
If women shouldn’t be bothered by showering with a tranny then the tranny shouldn’t be bothered by showering with men.
Locker room sex reassignment surgery might be needed in certain cases.
These idiots need to relearn the meaning of words most of us learned as toddlers: “man”, “woman”.
No, you nutball. You are the one who needs to understand that normal people do not care to be vulnerable and stark naked when there is a sexual freak in the immediate vicinity.
I'm willing to bet that's not true. I guess little girls are forced to shower in school gym classes. Obviously, it would be inappropriate to allow men to use the school showers when little girls are forced to use them.
I just can't imagine any school permitting that and I think there is such a thing as overselling opposition to a proposed law. There is enough really wrong with this kind of proposal. There is no need to exaggerate.
At a minimum, any laws in this area should begin with a recognition that no one should ever be forced to shower in public places if they are for any reason uncomfortable. I know that some kids may stink a bit by the end of the day, but you can't go down the crazy road that this proposed law will take us without making the whole thing voluntary.
How many off color jokes can the lawyers tell in the court room before the judge throws them out? And on what grounds? retorical
“We don’t judge our members and we don’t allow them to judge each other.”
Umm...you judged the woman who complained.
State mandated makes it unquestioned of government.
However, her DNA still says she is a man.
And, DNA don't lie.
So let me get this straight....these sex-freaks supposedly can’t control “who they are” sexually, but can absolutely control themselves in a mixed-sex locker room with no clothes on?
These idiots are the same people who decry religious people because they lack absolute proof of a deity, yet we are supposed to suspend actual proved reality and accept that a person with male DNA and a male penis is somehow a woman because he FEELS that way.
If a person dresses as Napoleon and demands that we turn over the government of France to him, are we required to go along with his insanity as well? Or is it simply people who suffer from sexual insanities that we are to humor.
.......with a penis.
Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.