How can a court overrule the official definition of an “assault rifle” from the ATF?
In my book they can’t. This should be overturned, but then I am not a lawyer.
In my book they can’t. This should be overturned, but then I am not a lawyer.
Assault *rifle* has an ATF definition - Assault *weapon* is a media creation that can vary based on state laws (which may or may not coincide with federal laws and/or ATF regulations). This distinction has been kicked around (and exploited) since Bush the Elder was in office.