Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

Yes, according to Andrew McCarthy.
**************

And the same Andrew McCarthy applauded Cruz for his effort:

“If you loathe the deal, as Cruz plainly does (watch his speech if you have any doubt), the objective should be to derail the deal.”

McCarthy goes on to explain and support Cruz’s strategy to enforce the agreement against Obama, and thereby, demonstrate that Obama is in violation of federal law. .

: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/423782/senator-ted-cruz-right-corker-law-period-congressional-review-iran-act-has-never-begun

****************

Look, you don’t like Cruz, don’t want to vote for him— that’s your business. But, don’t come on here peddling nonsense that Cruz was somehow complicit with Obama and/or the GOP-e to undermine American sovereignty - or is otherwise furtively supportive of Iran.

Stick to HB1 visas attack, that at least is based in fact.


81 posted on 09/30/2015 5:04:29 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: VinL

That is the very article I had in mind. This article was written BEFORE the final vote. That makes it all the more puzzling, because Cruz acted as if he was fighting it before the vote, then he voted for the bill, and now continues to campaign against the bill. Tom Cotton of Arkansas was by himself in voting against the bill.

from the article:

“Ted Cruz is not saying Congress should never have a vote on a resolution of disapproval. He is saying Congress should follow the law Republicans wrote, demand full disclosure of the agreement, hold the vote only after Obama has complied with his legal obligations, and keep the anti-Iran sanctions in place as long as possible.”

Notice: Cruz is saying “...hold the vote only after Obama has complied...”

Obama never complied, the Senate voted for the bill, the non-compliance is moot.

Remember, the bill was brought up during the last debate. The context was what they would do with it if they became president. Cruz never said a word about his supposed strategies you brought up. It is all water under the bridge.

“...don’t come on here peddling nonsense that Cruz was somehow complicit with Obama and/or the GOP-e to undermine American sovereignty - or is otherwise furtively supportive of Iran.”

“complicit...undermining American sovereignty”??

I merely recounted Cruz’s vote on the Corker bill. You can draw whatever conclusions you want. As Rush said, the passage of the Corker bill is all about the money American corporations stand to make. They donate to campaigns.


91 posted on 09/30/2015 5:34:10 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson