Posted on 09/30/2015 2:59:37 PM PDT by Kaslin
I believe I am correct in saying the ones the Russian attacked in Syria, although US allies, are also the ones who have been attacking Syrian Christians. If so - may Russia keep it up!!
With all due respect, I believe Mary was no more righteous than we are and that the elevation of her by Catholics is very sinful. God may or may not answer the Bishop’s prayers, but it won’t be because of his idolizing and praying to Mary. If he honors it, it will be in spite of his sinful adoration of Mary.
“Our” allies? More like Obama/Kerry/McCain’s Islamist allies.
Go Putin!
No such thing as a muslim ally!
The Obamunist Media wants you to know Russia is bombing Syria.
Meanwhile Saudi/US strikes in Yemen don’t exist for them, and most certainly for the low-infos.
I agree with you.
LEAD_FROM_BEHIND_PING!
Allies Allies We don’t have no stinkin’ allies
`Allies’ like McCain’s heart-eating cannibal butt buddy?
This has blown up in Obama’s face, like everything else.
The fruit of Obama and Hillary’s policy of “democratic” (i.e., Islamic) revolution in Syria, has been civil war, anarchy, and chaos. That chaos and anarchy allowed ISIS (or as John Kerry insists as if it matters, ISIL) to grow, commit horrible crimes, overwhelm Europe and soon the US with a refugee/Islamist migration crisis,destroy any hope of recovery in Iraq, and generally destabilize the Middle East region. Beneficiaries: Iran, Turkey, Islamists.
The current situation threatens Russia and CIS countries through returning Chechen and other Islamists training and fighting in Syria. Putin recognizes this and smells an opportunity to gain major influence on the cheap.
I assume Putin has concluded that propping up Assad is the most advantageous route to stabilizing Syria, so it is no longer a haven for ISIS and rival Islamist groups. Any fool can see that Obama either does not want to stop ISIS, or lacks the will and competence to do so. Taking out the US’s “moderate anti-Assad allies” is thus a necessary element of the solution.
When Russia crushes ISIS quickly, the US will be exposed as at best a feckless paper tiger, and alternatively, a cynical, dangerous, deliberate abettor of Islamism at its worst. Get’er done, Vlad.
The fruit of Obama and Hillary’s policy of “democratic” (i.e., Islamic) revolution in Syria, has been civil war, anarchy, and chaos. That chaos and anarchy allowed ISIS (or as John Kerry insists as if it matters, ISIL) to grow, commit horrible crimes, overwhelm Europe and soon the US with a refugee/Islamist migration crisis,destroy any hope of recovery in Iraq, and generally destabilize the Middle East region. Beneficiaries: Iran, Turkey, Islamists.
The current situation threatens Russia and CIS countries through returning Chechen and other Islamists training and fighting in Syria. Putin recognizes this and smells an opportunity to gain major influence on the cheap.
I assume Putin has concluded that propping up Assad is the most advantageous route to stabilizing Syria, so it is no longer a haven for ISIS and rival Islamist groups. Any fool can see that Obama either does not want to stop ISIS, or lacks the will and competence to do so. Taking out the US’s “moderate anti-Assad allies” is thus a necessary element of the solution.
When Russia crushes ISIS quickly, the US will be exposed as at best a feckless paper tiger, and alternatively, a cynical, dangerous, deliberate abettor of Islamism at its worst. Get’er done, Vlad.
Russia is not attacking OUR allies. He is attacking obama ayatollah’s allies, i.e., isis.
They are made up allies by the administration
Israel is our only ally in the region
Why are you using the future tense? obama has been on the ISIS side from the getgo.
I don’t get your Barry/Rush duo. Please explain
It didn’t make no sense to me either and I hope the freeper will explain, or rather has explained
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.