1 posted on
09/30/2015 5:46:33 AM PDT by
thackney
To: thackney
Well, then maybe we need some “inexplicable” explosions in the oil fields of Isistan and the land of the Soddomite Kings.
Kill two birds with one stone.
2 posted on
09/30/2015 5:51:35 AM PDT by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republican Freed the Slaves" month.)
To: thackney
Likely a gentle slope down rather than anything dramatic.
Operators are concentrating only on those areas considered core in which $50 oil remains attractive, and suppliers are dong everything in their power to keep their equipment busy as they ride out this dip.
3 posted on
09/30/2015 5:54:08 AM PDT by
bestintxas
(every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
To: thackney
“have stores of crude locked away in 914 wells that have been drilled but not turned on...”
So much for ‘peak oil’.
4 posted on
09/30/2015 6:15:52 AM PDT by
lacrew
To: thackney
From 1986 until about 2005, oil prices were under $50, average about $30. (Barrels crude.) I don't understand how oil producers are having so many issues now. Yes, fracking is more expensive and less productive, but for several of the companies to state they need oil at $70-80/bbl to be viable, That's a huge increase in costs, way more than it should be..?
http://www.macrotrends.net/1369/crude-oil-price-history-chart
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson