[xzins]

I would oppose him on principle even if he wasn’t on the outs with anti-establishment voters.

I do not want another Bush. It isn’t seemly.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I would oppose him on principle even if he wasn’t on the outs with anti-establishment voters.

Oh I would too....I oppose him A: because he's a Bush and conservatives do not go for royal family rule - and B: I oppose him because he's the quintessential establishment hack.

If it were just A, and he was conservative, I'd oppose him in the primary but vote for him in the general. Since it's ALSO B - I don't think I can do that.

[Lakeshark]

The good news is: You won't have to oppose him, he sandbags himself daily with his own foolish pronouncements that all ten of his supporters like. He's not a good candidate normally, and for these times he's just horrible.

The cartoon ends here:

[Servant of the Cross]

I do not want another Bush. It isn’t seemly.

Agreed. NOR Clinton. This family dynasty crap is for Monarchies, not a Republic like ours.