Carry a battalion of 5-800.
Posted on 09/28/2015 6:15:25 PM PDT by Enlightened1
as of
September 28, 2015
Underway Aircraft Carriers:
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) - Atlantic
USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) - 5th Fleet
USS George Washington (CVN 73) - Pacific
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) - Atlantic
USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) - Pacific
By the way - the Nimitz is in the midst of a year and a half long refit, nowhere near the eastern Med.
Here is another article about it.
Or here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3341360/posts
Debka is a blend of information, conjecture, and misinformation.
Here is Breitbart talking about it.
India news talking about it,
http://www.indrastra.com/2015/09/IM-Chinese-Military-Experts-Troops-Deployment-to-Syria-251.html
Israel talking about it,
Here is another article about it,
Perhaps but they were right about Russia moving in.
Everyone else was saying that was conspiracy theory.
I think they are correct on China too.
No, he isn't. Nothing about a Chinese aircraft carrier in the Breitbart story.
Nothing about a Chinese aircraft carrier being docked in Syria in the report from India, either. Since you are 0 for 2 at this point, I won't bother with your other links.
I don't understand why some folks here go to such links to try to support Debka, given their track record.
Russia’s there - there are pictures of of the planes on the ground and in the air. Not clear what the extent of the boots on the ground will be.
And China does have some limited naval assets in the Med. Remember, they deployed a ship to Libya a few years ago, and were able to send a ship to evacuate innocents from Yemen when the US couldn’t or wouldn’t. An amphib might be believable - they generally send smaller ships - but the carrier story strikes me a pure garbage.
Biggest landing craft in recorded history?
See post #38 for the Aircraft Carrier.
When you said in post #36,
“There were supposed to be 1000 marines in that report, too.”
My response was post #44.
Now you can get into semantics about what Chinese military is doing, but I think it’s pretty obverse the Chinese military is there.
If they have one aircraft carrier or not is simply a distraction issue from the main point that the Chinese military is there.
I recall when it was first reported on Free Republic of Russia moving into Syria. Many people were saying Debkafile was B.S., and Debakfile was full of it.
Well 2 months later it turns out to be the truth. I don’t know why you wait for the MSM to confirm it?They are certified on the record liars and deceivers.
And guess what? If this is bull, then it will come out in 2 months. However, I don’t doubt it.
It’s just like the baby harvesting too. People were saying it’s “conspiracy theory”, and it turns out to be the truth.
Maybe several large nations will join the party and hit all sides.
So...the Chinese are going to field troops along with the Russians to fight ISIS?
Now that would be wild.
Wonder what their ‘ rules of engagement ‘ are?
LOL!
One Tweet about this.
RT.com / Russia Today web site sites sources about Chinese aircraft carrier already passes through Suez Canal to be followed by troops.
Syrian sources tell Lebanese news org Al-Masdar Al-’Arabi Chinese are coming.
Carry a battalion of 5-800.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Might not be a healthy time for ISIS. Does the Mediterranean become a Chinese or Russian lake in 25 years.
Where is the Chinese aircraft carrier that DEBKA said was off Syria?
“The last time China went to war was when they invaded Vietnam in 1979, and the Vietnamese kicked their a$$.”
Not really. They held them off for a while but were eventually overwhelmed.
The Putinista wing of FReeRepublic is certainly hoping Putin can extend his empire into the Med.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.