Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sequoyah101

I just ran the numbers on my last 5 years income and am all for this. EVEN IF I LOSE EVERY SINGLE DEDUCTION I HAVE USED IN THE PAST. Including the personal deduction. The 50K at zero rate amply compensates for that.

What this plan says without saying it is that 50K is what you should try to earn and keep for your basic needs. The rest is taxed. 10% of the next 50K you earn is your share of what it takes to provide basic services to you. 20% of the next 200K seems a little aggressive but it is probably necessary since so few make more than 300K. The 25% bracket is reasonable to me for high earners. It does not remove my incentive to do better and keep 90 to 75% of what I earn.


102 posted on 09/28/2015 10:17:20 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101

“What this plan says without saying it is that 50K is what you should try to earn and keep for your basic needs. The rest is taxed. 10% of the next 50K you earn is your share of what it takes to provide basic services to you. 20% of the next 200K seems a little aggressive but it is probably necessary since so few make more than 300K. The 25% bracket is reasonable to me for high earners. It does not remove my incentive to do better and keep 90 to 75% of what I earn.”

MINIMUM UNTAXABLE INCOME! (MUI)

Should be indexed for inflation.


105 posted on 09/28/2015 10:22:29 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson