Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
But what did that mean in the context of 1787? What was the spirit of the law?

I think the wording is quite clear. What is there to not understand?

73 posted on 09/21/2015 7:57:57 AM PDT by gdani (No sacred cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: gdani
I think the wording is quite clear. What is there to not understand?

I think this wording is also quite clear:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.-

So that means slavery was abolished in 1776 right? That's what the words say don't they? The words are quite clear. All men have equal rights.

So does history demonstrate that those words mean that? No, they demonstrate quite the opposite. They don't really mean that at all.

I'm arguing that the prohibition against religious tests doesn't mean what people think either. Just because the words are plain doesn't mean that the interpretation of them is actually correct.

107 posted on 09/21/2015 8:57:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson