Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg
No, it doesn’t say that. It prevents him from a acquiring the description “natural-born citizen”, a description that is a requirement for being president.

You need to go reread the Naturalization act of 1790. It most certainly does say that. I'll excerpt the salient portion for you.

And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States:

126 posted on 09/21/2015 9:50:18 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

The part you cite has to be taken into the context of the fact that a person born anywhere outside of the United States of citizens of the United States will also be a citizen, and also a natural born citizen, BY RIGHT OF BIRTH. The portion you cite means that the person born of a non-citizen father has no right-of-birth status and has to go through the legalization process, not that they can never become a citizen.

As I said, the Act has been replaced, but its value now lies in the fact that it defines what the founders meant by “natural born citizen”.


130 posted on 09/21/2015 10:17:35 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson