Posted on 09/21/2015 2:45:14 AM PDT by markomalley
But Obama is a Christian...because Obama says he is and what more proof do we need than that?
NO, he is a MUSLIM.
The devil you say.....
No! Listen to this. Two thousand years of Christian civilization destroyed on his watch! Peters exclaimed. Thats on Obama. When America doesnt lead, nothing happens.
The money line statement!
It isn’t that the creep in chief is feckless, cowardice, incompetence.. ‘it’ does it on PURPOSE!!!
ping-a-roo
Bump
It was the two Bush administrations -- not Obama -- that p!ssed away hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of American lives over 15 years for the sole purpose of propping up Islamic royal families in places like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, while overthrowing one of the few governments in the Middle East (the Ba'athist regime in Iraq) that actually had Christians serving in high-ranking government positions.
If an American government was hell-bent on eradicating Christianity from the Middle East, it couldn't implement a more effective course of action than what was done under those two Bush @ssholes.
Except that it was stable when Bush left office, as Peters points out. It wasn’t Bush’s fault that Obama didn’t negotiate a SOFA. If Bush had had a responsible successor, things could have turned out very differently.
Christian Syrian Refugees Driven From Safe House In Sweden By Refugee Hordes of Muslims
Christian Post | July 23, 2015 | Vincent Funaro / FR Posted by Titus-Maximus
Syrian Christian refugees already living in Sweden say they were forced out of their asylum house by recent Muslim refugees who demanded they hide their crosses and banned them from using communal areas in the home they shared.
The Christians dared not stay. The atmosphere became too intimidating. And they got no help, said a Swedish government migration agency rep responsible for the center they were staying in to Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter. They chose themselves to organize [a] new address and moved away without our participation because they felt a discomfort.
The Christians, comprised of two families, were seeking asylum after fleeing from the Islamic State in Syria. And the place they were staying at housed around 80 people with many being Syrian Muslims.
Why would Obama negotiate a SOFA if Bush had already negotiated one that laid out explicit terms for the withdrawal of U.S. military personnel from Iraq after Bush left office?
I suggest Obama will his eyeballs to science. The
jaundiced way he looks at the world indicates he suffers
from a rare infection.....maybe a deadly eyeball-eating disease.
In 2008, the Clintons had pics of Obama in Muslim
dress. But Uncle Teddy warned them not to use them
Teddy and Caroline later endorsed Obama to certain victory.
======================================================
Realtime pics---taken in Kenya---not photoshopped.
Kenya-resident, Malik Obama in Muslim dress holds
up photo of his half brother Obama in Muslim dress,
taken during Obama's earlier visit to his Muslim homeland.
That was a political expedient at the time and was expected to be renegotiared when it expired. Obama could have kept the troops there with an updated SOFA but he didn’t.
1. What exactly was politically expedient for the Bush administration when it signed the SOFA?
2. Do you have any evidence to support your statement that it was "expected to be renegotiated" when it expired? How can the U.S. and Iraq renegotiate a Status of Forces Agreement after it "expires" if the original agreement includes provisions for the removal of all U.S. forces?
Because it made it easier for the Iraqi parliament to approve at the time. Yes, it was kicking the can down the road a bit but sometimes you do that.
Google it and you’ll see multiple sources saying it was expected to be renegotiated. I don’t think this is especially controversial.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/380508/no-us-troops-didnt-have-leave-iraq-patrick-brennan
Iraq became FUBAR once the Bush Admin. pushed the convoluted pro-Islamic Constitution there. BTW, “political expediency” without regard to being able to readjust the direction yourself is called incompetence, not strategy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.