Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
So where we disagree is in what a presidential candidate is allowed to say. You say he should express any view he wishes.

You bet. I wan't them to talk about every one of their views.

Apparently you think the "religious test" clause prohibits candidates from even bringing up the subject of religion.

I think you need to go back and read it again.

Further, even if the founders intended to prohibit the discussion of the religion of their opponents, the First Amendment is superior to the body of the Constitution. Freedom of Speech trumps anything in the body of the Constitution.

I say that as a candidate, he enters a different level in which ALL of his statements must be judged as if he were president, and therefore are considered differently.

So you would prefer that Candidates keep their mouths shut about religion when they run for office. I guess that means that they can't even say they are Christians themselves. This issue should be off the table in your constitutional view, right?

When a Dem says something like "When I'm elected I'll confiscate guns." That disqualifies him immediately

So rather than express what he intends to do as president, he would just keep that little secret to himself?

I really don't think you understand the "religious test" clause at all. Nor do you understand the First Amendment.

The people elect "REPRESENTATIVES". I want someone who represents me both politically and religiously.

FWIW I certainly would not vote for a Fundamentalist Mormon or a Scientologist for any office.

In your view that makes me either some kind of bigot or someone who does not believe in the Constitution.

73 posted on 09/20/2015 9:20:56 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Tagline pending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Good on Ben. One look at Pews polling of American Muslims makes this a wise decision since 1 in 4 said they support Al Qaeda and suicide bombers. That’s right, 1 in 4 owned up to it which means probably another 25% feel the same way but would not say so to a pollster.


77 posted on 09/20/2015 9:25:25 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

So a guy says “I’ll ban guns” and you say “See, he’s going to violate the Constitution.” Carson says, “I won’t observe the ‘no religious test’ clause,” and you say, “But he’s talking as a private citizen about violating the Constitution. HUGE difference. HUGE. /s


78 posted on 09/20/2015 9:25:31 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe; LS; jwalsh07

He can run; but he can’t hide.

Ben is saying he wouldn’t knowingly vote for a Muslim for president. I wouldn’t either.


95 posted on 09/20/2015 10:08:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson