Are you saying it’s not a valid measurement?
After significant academic and political hoo-rah about the errors, most psychologists decided to call raw intelligence "g" and agreed to disagree about how to measure it.
Calling IQ names does not in the least negate the existence of raw intelligence, that it is commonly referred to as "g" these days, and that it is largely based on genetic inheritance with the usual variations inherent in species.
Citation?