As my wife was showing the meeting in Dallas last night, we were both impressed with the crowds.
What concerns me is that there have been other leaders with great crowds. They did not work out well.
Romney had big crowds. Same people showed up for romney but they got stabbed by him when he would not fight. These crowds want to win at something. A 30 year losing streak sucks
“What concerns me is that there have been other leaders with great crowds. They did not work out well.”
While others worked out extremely well.
If you want to win, you have to have crowds. Otherwise, you lose.
I guarantee you, losing never wins.
“What concerns me is that there have been other leaders with great crowds. They did not work out well.”
That is the talking point that came out today, to make suggestions to the suggestible. Reagan had large, enthusiastic crowds; I was in one of them. I was in a Bush #1 crowd once during his second run; it was low-key. Historically, the winning candidate has very large crowds. That is why they win.
Seems to me as if you're making a veiled criticism of Dear Leader DT. Tsk, tsk.
Just between you, me and the fence post, you may be flamed if you keep up that kind of nonsense behavior.