Posted on 09/13/2015 4:51:15 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
The Obama administration has said it will allow 10,000 Syrian refugees to resettle in the US over the next year. Is this enough? And are there any risks? An estimated 340,000 asylum seekers have arrived in Europe this year, coming from as far as Eritrea, Iraq and Nigeria.
But the largest portion are coming from Syria, and US officials have been at pains to show how much the US is giving in aid.
According to the White House's National Security Council, the US is the single largest donor to the Syrian crisis response, having given over $4bn (£2.6bn) since the crisis began.
But some, such as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon's special representative on migration, have said that throwing money at the problem is not enough - it's about taking people.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
If the Saudis really did take them in, I would like to see proof. I trust the Saudis even less than the Feds.
If they actually took in refugees, they can take the Muslims, I would consent to the US taking Syrian Christians.
But, let’s face it, the US has supported the Syrian rebels (ISIS and Al Qaeda) against Assad in these ridiculous destabilization efforts. It’s US/NWO foreign policy that is chiefly to blame. Syria has pipelines that US/EU wants and Syria is not an IMF member which is a big no no for the global banksters.
Even after the terrorist attacks in Paris, Obama still wants to bring them to our country.
He’s playing for the other side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.