Skip to comments.
Kentucky town's brush with gay marriage spotlight stirs tensions
Reuters ^
| 9/11/15
| Steve Bittenbender
Posted on 09/11/2015 3:30:48 PM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: lee martell
They’re saying that since ideas of marriage have “evolved” this ipso facto makes it okay for marriage to “evolve” in the direction it is being ballyhooed by the luggbutts.
They can’t miss that it still was a man and a woman who generally would have children and raise them in a family. This is not like the difference between cherry and strawberry pie. This is like the difference between cherry pie and a hunk of cement.
21
posted on
09/11/2015 4:44:39 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: lee martell
I picked it up at pookie 18’s weekday cartoon postings. Lot’s of good stuff there.
22
posted on
09/11/2015 4:45:29 PM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: MarvinStinson
Wrote a few songs 25 or so years ago when I played drums and guitar in a few bands.
Nothing to write home about.
I have no tongue for sonnets or plays.
I love reading articles, but am not well book read. Have to look up a number of terms FReepers use every time i’m on the board, lol
23
posted on
09/11/2015 4:46:41 PM PDT
by
dp0622
To: markomalley
Isn’t this a liberal stronghold? Years ago, 1940s or so, it may have been competitive politically.
24
posted on
09/11/2015 4:50:47 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: lee martell
The sign is based on a false premise. Americans, on the whole, have never traded their daughters hand in marriage for a bunch of livestock. That’s something other cultures still do, such as in Africa.
No, don't fall for their misdirection. Marriage is between a man and a woman. How that man and woman get into that arrangement has nothing to do with the institution of marriage. Marriage definition has NOT been redefined, ever, until now.
26
posted on
09/11/2015 5:19:48 PM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: markomalley
Apples and oranges. Dowries were between private parties and nothing to do with the garriage fraud.
By the way, the Supreme Court did not redefine marriage, they undefined it.
27
posted on
09/11/2015 5:50:49 PM PDT
by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: fr_freak
“No, don’t fall for their misdirection. Marriage is between a man and a woman. How that man and woman get into that arrangement has nothing to do with the institution of marriage.”
Two thumbs up. Way up.
28
posted on
09/11/2015 6:24:27 PM PDT
by
theoriginaljdp
(Check yo mama's privilege!)
To: markomalley
American's Christians are launching a MASSIVE counterattack:
1. Prayer meeting
2. Arts and crafts
3. Bake sale
4. More prayer
To: fella
The liberal movement looks at photoshop pics like that and laugh their asses off.
As long as our side remains so weak and disorganized and p*ssified, that's what we can expect.
To: markomalley
We’ve already redefined marriage? Redefined it as meaningless?
31
posted on
09/11/2015 10:34:24 PM PDT
by
NetAddicted
(Just looking)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson