BTW, will they have to change the sickle cell requirement in KY law? Doesn’t that assume a procreative couple?
402.310, 320, 340
I’m so confused. Is it more prejudiced not to pretend they can have kids or to treat them like they can’t?
402.210 Issuance of license when either party under eighteen.
- (1) If either of the parties is under eighteen (18) but over sixteen (16) years of age and not before married, no license shall issue without the consent required by KRS 402.020(1)(f), personally given or certified in writing to the clerk over the signature of the person consenting in accordance with KRS 402.020(1)(f), attested by two (2) subscribing witnesses and proved by the oath of one (1) of the witnesses, administered by the clerk. If the parties are personally unknown to the clerk, a license shall not issue until bond, with good surety, in the penalty of one hundred dollars ($100) is given to the Commonwealth, with condition that there is no lawful cause to obstruct the marriage.
- (2) If either of the parties is under sixteen (16) years of age, no license shall issue without the permission of a District Judge, as required by KRS 402.020(1)(f)3., in the form of a certified copy of a written court order.
One would think they need to rewrite this entire law due to the Scotus violation of the constitution.