SCOTUS declared Kentucky's marriage law unconstitutional - Kentucky has yet to pass a replacement law, exactly who is an eligible couple in Kentucky? And please explain to me why it is merely limited to a couple? At this point, I can think of no rational argument once you've tossed out the meaning of the word 'marriage.'
Just posting what the judge’s order says ... doesn’t solve Ms. Davis’s issue (as her atty also said at her release) & I have no answer to your question.
>>And please explain to me why it is merely limited to a couple? At this point, I can think of no rational argument once you’ve tossed out the meaning of the word ‘marriage.’
The Gaystapo says that we are just being silly for asking that question and that we are making a mockery of love with it.
But it is the question to be asked. If marriage is about “loving whomever I choose”, what limits it to 2 people? Biologically, polygamy makes more sense than monogamy. Socially, it makes men clean up their act to find mates because the competition just got a lot more serious. They’ve declared religion to be a non-issue in the argument, so that would include all religions.