I’m sorry, but all this does is prove how hypocritical he is - he can afford to do all that. What about the seniors sitting in the cold because they can’t afford to turn the heater on?
Cheap power is the basis of all comfort, not to mention industry. What does Chuck lose by being so environmentally conscientious? Absolutely nothing! It’s others who suffer when power costs are pushed up through subsidies for uneconomic “renewables”. If anything, Charles profits from it as a major landlord.
He doesn't set power prices and he'd be totally against the idea that these people can't afford power. That's probably why he thinks it's people like him who should be making the changes, not the people with nothing.
If you want to make him a scapegoat for every stupid idea somebody else has come up with, feel free. I'll judge him on what he does and what he says and what he advocates - not on what other people do.