Sorry, but "possibly" is equivocation.
And your defense of Trump is an excuse -- as so many defenses of Trump's equivocations are.
There are many reasons to like what Trump is saying and has done on the campaign trail. At the same time, there are many questions concerning his suitability as a conservative nominee.
“Sorry, but “possibly” is equivocation.”
Equivocation in the sense of being non-committal, yes, which would mean he is reluctant to do it. The sense of some of these posters is that Trump is salivating over just the thought to flood the country with Muslims. Again, you and I can say, “Hell no!!” but not someone on an international stage with certain people waiting like vultures to devour him over every word he utters.
‘At the same time, there are many questions concerning his suitability as a conservative nominee”
I forgot to add — People in Louisiana got to vote out Mary Landrieu last November in favor of a candidate, Bill Cassidy, who ran as Ronald Reagan Junior. He won, and turned into Mary Lite in a matter of days. How many Tea Party senators have betrayed the ones who put them in office? At least Trump is bold enough to run “conservative” on the issues that matter. What other “conservative” candidates are even doing that?