It is a fact that in 2008 Obama got 66% of the Latino vote and 62% of the Asian vote. In 2012, exit polling data showed that he got 71% of the Latino vote and 73% of the Asian vote.
Those aren’t rumors or opinions, they are facts. The other racial/ethnic demographc groups showed less support for Obama in 2012 than in 2008.
You moonbats are just about too much for me. I can only wade so deep into the craziness; after that, I just leave it all to you.
There are two possible explanations for the uptick in south-of-the-border foreign invader votes, and one impossible explanation. First, the actual possibilities.
Far and away the most likely is that The Obama/Soros cheat machine was four yrs worth of work improved over ‘08. For Obama’s first election it was up and running and did yeoman’s work. But practice makes perfect, plus the extra four yrs were not wasted.
A freeper who lives in LA posted just a few days ago how it works. Dem operatives visit EVERY Latino household. Their preference is to get them to vote absentee—a straight Dem ticket, of course. Barring that they either physically haul them to the voting place on the day of the election, making sure the ‘immigrant’ [haha] understands their self-interest in voting ‘D’, or, as the election day winds down, Dem operatives vote the ballots of those Latinos they were otherwise unable to coerce. (But only to the degree that the vote is needed. Once they’ve won the precinct they stop, so as to conserve resources while not making their racket overly obvious. (Though they have been known to cast more votes in some districts than there are registered voters. If it takes 110% to win, then that is how many votes they cast in critical races.))
Option two, dramatically less likely. The ‘immigrant,’ having lived longer in the US, comes to understand the connection between voting Dem and enjoying a never-ending flood of taxpayer largesse. (Immigrants receive ‘gov’ benefits in far greater percentages than homegrown US citizens.) There was just yesterday an article posted about how quickly and irrevocably ‘immigrants’ become addicted to public assistance. Once addicted, they will do whatever is required to keep the spigot flowing. Thus, an uptick in Latino votes for the Welfare Party.
Now, to the possibility that never happened. In the perfervid, unmoored-from-reality mind of the moonbat, there was a Latino who was neither contacted by a Dem opperative nor aware that amnesty and a cornucopia of other goodies stood a far greater likelihood under Obama than under the guy who had written off 47% of the electorate—i.e.: the part our ‘immigrant’ belonged to. So with no bias of any kind, this innocent Latino just happegned to be paying very close attention to the election.
And what do you think happened next? Why, he heard that Trump—not Boehner, not McConnell, not the RNC, not the House, not the Senate, but Trump—challenged Obama re: his BC. The nerve!!
And so upset was this innocent Latino that then and there he vowed to vote for Obama. It was his big chance to get even, and man oh man was he jumping on it!
Sorry, Nero Germanicus, but you have to be borderline psychotic to believe that’s what happened. [Which, it just occured to me, goes far in explaining why moonbats believe it.] It is all a figment of mentally skewed obot adult-children. They finally gave up on the tooth fairy, but they still believe Latinos so worship Obama that they would surge to the polling places to avenge The Won’s honor. It’s too delusional for words.
But as I said before, you go right on believing it. Wouldn’t want the splodey head syndrome to set in, if you actually attempted to divorce yourself from the obots’ favorite fairytale.