From the article which is the subject of this thread:
“In conclusion, not a single argument put forth by the eligibility challengers holds up. Each is either a misinterpretation at best or an outright falsehood at worst. Arguing over this issue has become a waste of time much better spent on other things. Unfortunately, there are a few folks who continue to cling to this view, and equally unfortunate is the often venomous attitude they display toward anyone who disagrees with them. Most of the arguments you may encounter will consist of one or more of the claims we have covered above. And most of the time, they will count on you not bothering to actually try to research or verify what they claim a particular court case says. Consider this your “Cliff Notes” on all their arguments—a concise, documented reference to all that is wrong about their claims.”
Conservatives value debate and conservatives can disagree with each other as an expression of our God-Given First Amendment rights.
Your quote:
‘I prefer to look at facts: what has happened and what is happening now.
Based on what has happened with Obama and the theory that he was not born in the U.S., the challenges to his eligibility helped him with undecided voters more than it hurt him. That’s why he wanted to keep the issue alive rather than resolving it.’
You pretend what you wrote was a ‘fact,’ but it’s actually no more than obot lore/propaganda. Of course the instant you were challenged, you beat a hasty retreat into the historical-rewrite, ‘it’s only my opinion.’ I offered you a ‘fact’ that proves your opinion wrong, and you assiduously avoided it.
As long as you use this site to promote the obot meme that questioning Obama’s integrity helps him now or has helped him in the past, you will be challenged.