Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace

Whataya expect, the SC has three of the most liberal women in the country on it and two of them did not have the honor and integrity to recuse themselves because of conflict of interest. And in addition, one of them is most likely a flaming queer in her own right.

The only recourse I see is two conservative appointments to the SC when the time comes and then do it all over again. What about congress passing new laws? Hep me out here.


70 posted on 09/05/2015 11:11:26 AM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: biff
The only recourse I see is two conservative appointments to the SC ....

The Republican Party will see to it that never happens.

75 posted on 09/05/2015 11:16:39 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: biff
Whataya expect, the SC has three of the most liberal women in the country on it and two of them did not have the honor and integrity to recuse themselves because of conflict of interest.

During her confirmation hearing, Alana Kagan said that "there is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage." Also during her confirmation hearing, she was asked about the Defense of Marriage Act, pursuant to which states cannot recognize same-sex marriages originating in other states. Kagan indicated that she would defend the act if "there was any reasonable basis to do so."

She lied to congress (perjury) and misrepresented herself during the hearings. She should be immediately impeached and removed from the court. Perhaps she is the one that should be jailed for contempt of congress not a clerk in KY who did recuse herself.

80 posted on 09/05/2015 11:34:36 AM PDT by DaveyB (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson