The writer’s argument is built on the fallacy that because a court says something it is “the law.”
Every principle this country was built upon says the exact opposite.
And the Constitution conveys no such authority to the courts.
...”the Constitution conveys no such authority to the courts”...
I’m interested can you elaborate when you can take a moment please...and thank you. I tried to find something on that but that’s constitution “reading” laws which can often be too dutch for me!