To: caww; Jim Robinson; EternalVigilance
pinging you and couple others to what Eternal Vigilance has posted in several posts....if the Constitution does not convey such authority to the courts...then this Davis case may erupt to be far more than what imagined....I also hope Cruz is chiming in with her legal team.
111 posted on
09/04/2015 7:27:32 PM PDT by
caww
To: caww
You, and perhaps others here, may not like to hear it, but the fact is that Cruz is also a judicial supremacist.
I’ve studied his words, record, and positions very, very closely, and I have absolutely no doubt about that.
He’s really slick about it, as you would expect a Harvard-trained lawyer to be, but he is one.
112 posted on
09/04/2015 7:32:40 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Contempt of a lawless court is not a criminal act, it's a citizen's duty.)
To: caww; EternalVigilance
He’s right on some things, but unfortunately there’s no one running that’s good enough to satisfy him. And never will be. So he’ll run for president himself (again).
114 posted on
09/04/2015 7:45:50 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: caww
.if the Constitution does not convey such authority to the courts...then this Davis case may erupt to be far more than what imagined.... The Constitution DOES NOT grant the power to the USSC, or even the Federal Courts, both of which have usurped the Constitutional Rights of individuals, and of states, that have been in place for the last 230+ years.
If this doesn't erupt into something larger and more meaningful, sparking the type conviction and soul searching equal to or greater than that of the Civil Rights era movement, then our country is LOST.
That point cannot be understated.
134 posted on
09/04/2015 8:31:41 PM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson