Yeah, you posted a picture. Do you see that big blue thing in the security guy’s hand? That’s the other guy’s sign, which the security guy had stolen from him moments before. In other words, the security guy stole his sign BEFORE the supposed “assault.”
Re: the “assault” - See how the guy is reaching his arm around the security guy’s back, towards the sign in his hand? Looks to me like the guy is trying to take back the sign—again, the sign that the security guard had just stolen from him. How is that assault?
Jumping on someone's back or grappling at them from behind is the very definition of an assault... unless you're an imbecile. Then when someone jumps you from behind it's not an assault, it's an opportunity to bash the candidate who's not your guy.
In that case, armed security details should just allow people to jump on them and possibly grab their weapons.
The little Illegal Invader was borrowing it, he didn't “own” it. I still haven't seen what actually happened before the Security Officer was attacked from behind, but using the excuse that since the guy possibly took the borrowed Sign from the Illegal Invader entitled the Illegal Invader to Commit Assault and Battery is ridiculous.
The Illegal Invader is lucky that the Security Guard didn't hit him too hard or he would have hit the Pavement. The Security Guard doesn't have eyes in the back of his head.
It was like a Chihuahua attacking a Pit Bull.
Making this a hate Trump Thread has nothing to do with what happened. It is a case of Assault and Battery, period.