Replies

In detail, please explain to me and the rest of us which part is a reach.

The part where I called a man who ‘evangelizes’ on television? Because by definition that makes one a ‘televangelist’ whether it’s Swaggart, Baker, Roberts of Franklin/Billy Graham. Because you disapprove of the term does not change the fact that it’s accurate.

The part where I correctly and accurately pointed out that Frankie did in fact throw his ‘christian’ support behind a guy that has a long history of VERY anti-christian activities? A man who went so far as to give thousands of dollars to fight the very idea that life begins at conception? Because thats one of the things Planned Parenthood is 100% about. We don’t even need to get into the rest of his anti-christian crap but we can if you like.

Mitt, Donnie, Marie and Harry Reid can practice whichever bastardization of Christianity they want. Thats their free choice. But please don’t sit there and tell me a cult that has it;s own rewrite of biblical Christianity is in fact, christian. And please don’t sit there insulting the intelligence of anyone saying that a ‘Christian’ preacher that gives that nonsense his blessing is anything but a gold plated fraud. Words and terms mean things unless one is a liberal. And Christianity does not specify being your own God on your own planet when you join the choir invisible.

For the record, I was raised Roman Catholic and left the faith when their leadership decided that God didn’t know what he was talking about and they knew better. These days I consider myself a believer in the God of the Bible. Call that what you will.
i don’t claim to be pious, holy, free from sin or keeper of secret knowledge. Then again I’m not on TV trying to win converts to my wallet and liberal causes/people either.

I get that people that voted for Romney want to bitterly cling to any fig leaf to justify that decision. But facts are facts.