RE: Because their signature is not required on the marriage license, only the chief clerk’s is. Their opinion doesn’t matter any more than the janitor’s opinion.
There is a very easy solution to this — GO TO A JUDGE ( one judge in the county was willing to do the signing ) or go to a neighboring county ( there are 120 counties in Kentucky ).
The gays INSIST however in coming to Kim Davis.
This is the same as the Colorado gays who INSIST on going to the Christian Baker for their cake when they knew he would refuse and there are hundreds of other bakers out there who would be willing to do it for them ( and the Christian baker even referred them to a few ).
It’s not about getting a license, it’s about the HUNT.
There is a very easy solution to this — GO TO A JUDGE ( one judge in the county was willing to do the signing ) or go to a neighboring county ( there are 120 counties in Kentucky ).
The gays INSIST however in coming to Kim Davis.
This is the same as the Colorado gays who INSIST on going to the Christian Baker for their cake when they knew he would refuse and there are hundreds of other bakers out there who would be willing to do it for them ( and the Christian baker even referred them to a few ).
It’s not about getting a license, it’s about the HUNT
---
Exactly, they're TARGETING clerks based on knowledge of their religious beliefs -- or put another way, religious persecution.
Few are talking about the fact that the Supreme Court ruling should have been 4 to 3 against -- two of the justices should have recused themselves for conflict of interest because both of them had previously performed same-sex marriages. I'm sure if you haven't heard who they are you could guess which ones!