So, until he proves he's innocent, he's guilty. Got it. Are you familiar with the amnesty that Reagan granted AFTER this man came to the United States?
If he were trying to get the sign back, he would have grabbed the sign, not the guard. By the way, where he grabbed the guard is where the man’s weapon is kept. Do you know what happens when you grab a cop by his service revolver? You get shot.
As I said, it is IMPOSSIBLE to see what happened for about half a second when someone stepped in front of the camera.
I suppose we should be happy that the BODYGUARD (not a cop) didn't shoot the guy, because THAT would be the end of Trump's candidacy.
And again, if the guard took the sign and shouldn’t have, the illegal should have called the cops, not attacked him.
Really? So, if YOU are out on the street and some punk comes and takes something from you instead of going after them you will wait for the police?
“So, until he proves he’s innocent, he’s guilty. Got it. Are you familiar with the amnesty that Reagan granted AFTER this man came to the United States?”
First off, my opinion is not a court of law.
From the article it sounds like we’re talking about some real, red-blooded Americans here, huh?
‘This is a real f****** immigrant’ and ‘Go back to Europe!’
‘We need to spread the philosophy of the Aztec people!’ one of the protesters yelled. ‘We need to spread the ideas of the Mayan people!’
Second of all, just because the article says the “immigrant” has been here for thirty years, that doesn’t mean he has been. They wouldn’t have an agenda now would they?
Finally, you don’t get to assault someone then cry about it after you get smacked. Typical liberal bull. And yes, the illegal should have followed the law. I know it’s crazy because they don’t follow any of the other laws but it is what it is. Not understanding what is so radical about that.