Then Marlowe certainly knows it is not necessary to enact a new law every single time a state or federal court strikes down a law, in whole or part.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. SCOTUS' wrong-headed decision in Obergefell did not invalidate the entirety of Kentucky's, or any other state's, marriage laws. Only as they apply to prohibitions against gay marriages.
I posted Chief Justice John Roberts’ comment that it did invalidate marriage laws in most states. I believe I gave you the excerpt from his opinion. Then there is the savings/severability issue. You can, of course, see that the state might no longer want tax connections in their marriage law since those were based on procreativity.