so your position is that any elected Christian public servant should resign (==surrender), betraying her constituents, disenfranchising those who elected her as a professing Christian, and violate said consitutents’ unalienalble rights to representation by “consent of the governed” as guareenteed under the DI?
not to mention the unlawful violation of her right to obey Christ under the 1st Amendment?
“so your position is that any elected Christian public servant should resign (==surrender), betraying her constituents, disenfranchising those who elected her as a professing Christian, and violate said consitutents’ unalienalble rights to representation by “consent of the governed” as guareenteed under the DI?
This particular position of this person is not of interpretation of the laws, their job is to follow them. Your argument, like most on this thread, is faulty.
What “unalienable right” are we talking about here? Please explain in detail. It certainly isn’t about representation, because she is not in a governmental position to create law or interpret it. It is to follow and enforce it.