Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

The USSC does not have authority to legislate State marriage laws.


634 posted on 09/03/2015 2:48:08 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

They channeled a right to deem a same sex pairing a marriage. Wherever that came from, that was not the Constitution. It was modern anchorless moral relativism.

Well the pushback is beginning in earnest, and the heat is not going to let up anytime soon.


635 posted on 09/03/2015 2:49:59 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

I fully agree.

The ruling was based on a false premise: That anyone was denied the right to marry.

Each and every mentally competent individual can find a person of the opposite sex and marry them.

No one was ever denied that right.
.


636 posted on 09/03/2015 2:50:44 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

The USSC was intended to be the weakest of the three branches of government. We are definitely looking at, and living under, an activist judicial tyranny.


638 posted on 09/03/2015 2:54:08 PM PDT by HandyDandy (Don't make-up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson