Nobody was forcing her to participate. She could have resigned. When she accepted the job she was not required to act in ways that violated her religious or moral standards.
She is not refusing to perform the duties that were conditions of her original employment.
Why should she now be forced to violate her conscience or lose her job and be imprisioned because the government has changed the conditions of her employment in order to satisfy the wishes of militant homosexuals?
When she accepted the job she was not required to act in ways that violated her religious or moral standards. She is not refusing to perform the duties that were conditions of her original employment.
Why should she now be forced to violate her conscience or lose her job and be imprisioned because the government has changed the conditions of her employment in order to satisfy the wishes of militant homosexuals?
Exactly correct.